
Concerning the aesthetics, I realize that I am going up against a very traditional market. Ours is a purely function driven design- the function being to maximize resonance in a small body instrument while also being comfortable to play. The absence of curves allows for greater volume in the soundbox as compared with the traditional double-O. The guitar would be considerably wider with curves added to the width. Likewise, the resonance chamber would have less air to excite if we were to keep the existing dimensions with curves removing from the overall form.
The reduction in width (and length) means that the Blackbird fits on the plane/car/bike/train/boat. The carbon fiber means that one doesn't need a hard case, in fact our gig bag manufacturer who makes composite cases as well says that our guitars are tougher than their carbon cases. This means a very low profile instrument to travel with. Incidentally because this guitar need not be babied it is generally out of the case and ready to play.
Regarding playing comfort, there are few things that I wanted to clarify given that ergonomics are a major concern for us. The width of the Blackbird Classical against the thigh when played in the standard position is the same as the waist of a typical classical guitar (around 10 inches). Given the lightweight of the Blackbird in general and the neck/head in particular (in comparison to a conventional neck/head) instead of the upper bout hooking on the thigh, friction and weight of the right arm keep the guitar balanced quite well. It does take a few hours to get used to but It is comfortable to play. Of course one really must try to believe. I am hoping to get into the GFA conference- we'll see if I can get in. Any suggestions?
Monday, June 2, 2008
Carbon Fiber Guitar aesthetics and ergonomics
Labels:
acoustic guitar,
blackbird,
businessweek,
carbon fiber,
design,
ergonomics,
guitar,
guitars,
portable,
san francisco,
travel guitar
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment